Skip to main content

Camelot: The Panto!

Illustration by Sarah McIntyre


I thought my Third Arthurian Phase was at end with the completion of Gwenevere, which we’ll be releasing on YouTube at Christmas… but NO! By a strange coincidence, this year’s Moorland Merrymakers panto at Leusdon Memorial Hall was Camelot.  So various props and costumes from Gwenevere got another outing (a bit like how, in the early ‘80s, Adam and the Ants and Tenpole Tudor used to turn up in suits of armour from Excalibur). And I got to play Merlin…

It me.

Obviously it wouldn’t be on for me to review a show I was in, but I thought it might be worth blogging about the script, in case anyone out there is looking for a good panto to produce. Written by Ben Crocker, Camelot comes in at a neat 2 hours 20 minutes including interval, and although at first glance the jokes are mostly fairly lame, that doesn’t seem to matter in panto - when I wrote some for the Merrymakers a few years back I think I put in too many gags, thinking they had to work like comedy. In fact, a panto script just needs to provide a good structure, and the performers can provide most of the laughs by adding in local gags and references of their own. There are about thirteen big roles in Camelot, and plenty of smaller ones for the chorus as knights, witches, and villagers. It would suit a slightly larger stage than the tiny one we have at Leusdon, and the script calls for pyrotechnic effects which were beyond us, but we seemed to get by all right without. The second half features two good, slapstick chase scenes.

The connection to actual Arthurian legend is extremely tenuous - even Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur: Legend of the Sword was more canonical than this. But this is probably how most people encountered Arthur in the past - as a vaguely familiar character popping up to slay giants in local folk tales, largely unmoored from the high-flying stuff Geoffrey of Monmouth and Thomas Malory were writing about. This Camelot is really just a standard panto plot with ‘Prince Arthur’ as principle boy, Uther Pendragon as his absent-minded father (still alive here - no sword in the stone business in this version), Guinevere as heroine, and Merlin and Morgan Le Fay in the good fairy/wicked witch roles.(Morgan is trying to stop Arthur and Guinevere marrying because ‘then Camelot will be doomed’, so there’s no Lancelot business looming in this version either, though there is a cowardly jester called Laughalot.) 

The only bits of business that seem to be drawn from other Arthurian works are Arthur spying on Gwenevere as she makes her way to Camelot at the beginning, which I think comes from Lerner and Loewe’s Camelot, and Morgan le Fay imprisoning Merlin in his laboratory which I suppose echoes Nimue/Vivien imprisoning him in the cave or tree in various versions of the legend. Merlin starts to age backwards in the second half, which feels like a nod to TH White. And, slightly bizarrely, there’s a long slapstick scene involving a perilous enchanted bed, a motif which is found in Arthurian romances by Chrëtien de Troyes and others - I hope they’d be pleased to find it still entertaining us in the 21st Century. 

Rob Steemson, Lloyd Mortimer, me, and Phil Smith in a scene from Camelot: the Panto

Camelot:the Panto and Ben Crocker’s other panto scripts are available from his website.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Merlin (1998)

I remember Merlin being shown on TV as a two-part mini-series over a bank holiday weekend. The version I found on YouTube is a single three hour movie, but I think it might work better in two chunks, as originally broadcast. It still works pretty well, though. Director Steve Barron is completely infatuated with video editing tricks and slightly primitive CGI effects that I’m sure were state-of-the-art when it was made, but he uses them quite inventively, and there are some very enjoyable performances. Since First Knight was such a washout, I guess this is the definitive ‘90s Arthurian film. Like Excalibur , the definitive ‘80s Arthurian film, it tries to tell the entirety of the Arthur story, but since it’s main focus is Merlin it covers a lot more too, and Arthur himself ends up being a bit of a side-character, with the rise and fall of Camelot packed into the second half. At first glance, Merlin seems to be aligning itself with what I’m coming to think of as the Low Arthurian tradi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lord of the Rings 7: Minas Tirith

'This is not a work which many adults will read through more than once,' claimed the historical novelist Alfred Duggan, reviewing The Lord of the Rings when it was published. But I've read it through LOADS of times and now I'm blogging my latest re-read, so what did he know? And so we come to Minas Tirith, Tower of Guard, citadel of Gondor, seven tiers of fancy white fortifications built against a buttress of Mount Mindolluin, with the Tower of Ecthelion rising a thousand feet above the plain. It seems to me the template on which a whole genre of knock-off fantasy cities has been based - I guess Robert E Howard and people wrote about such places before Tolkien, and perhaps there were cities of equal grandeur on Barsoom, but when concept art threads on Instagram throw up unlikely gold and marble castles built on mountaintops and over waterfalls they always look distinctly Minas Tirithy to me. I'm wondering now if London in Mortal Engines was subconsciously echoin...
5 comments
Read more

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword

One of the reasons the Arthurian Legends appeal so much to writers and film makers is that there is no single original version. If there ever was, it was a tale told by some Romano-British storyteller, sitting by a fire in a damp hall, perhaps expounding on the great deeds of a local ruler or late Roman general, and spicing up the action with some motifs borrowed from old Celtic myths. In the centuries that followed, the story grew, and changed. Lots of legends about other heroes got tacked on to it. French and German poets got hold of it and added Camelot, the Grail, and Courtly Love: Malory borrowed from them all in his Morte D’Arthur . Later, everyone from Tennyson to TH White to Rick Wakeman to little me retold the stories, altering them to fit our own vision and reflect our own times. So you can do whatever you like with King Arthur: everyone else has. At least, that’s the theory. Now here's Guy Ritchie’s 2017 box office catastrophe King Arthur, Legend of the Sword to destru...
1 comment
Read more