Skip to main content

Jojo Rabbit


When I was rambling on about Terrance Malick’s A Hidden Life recently, I was rather disparaging about Jojo Rabbit. That was a bit unfair, because I enjoyed it - it’s funny and engaging, which is pretty much all I ask of most films these days. But when I tried to write about it I found that the weighty subject matter demanded I take it seriously, and I started thinking about a lot of problems which I was happy enough to ignore while I was actually watching it. So first of all, I did enjoy it, and I recommend it to anyone who doesn’t find said weighty subject matter off-putting. And second of all, there will be SPOILERS.

As you probably know, Jojo Rabbit is a comedy about a young boy growing up in the final months of Nazi Germany and earnestly trying to fit in with the Hitler Youth and do his bit for the war effort, encouraged by his imaginary friend, a goofy version of Hitler played by director Taika Waititi. Tom Holland, in his excellent book Dominion, points out that Hitler has replaced the Devil as the embodiment of evil for modern, post-Christian Europeans, but as well as being the embodiment of evil the Devil was always been a figure of fun, outsmarted by the heroes and heroines of folk tales and subjected to slapstick indignities in miracle plays. There’s a long and honourable tradition of treating Hitler with the same contempt, and Taika Waikiki’s ludicrous, child-like Führer is the latest in a line that stretches back via Mel Brooks to Charlie Chaplin and Ernst Lubitsch.

Although goofy Hitler is naturally the big selling point in the trailers, he’s a relatively minor element of the movie, which is more about Jojo’s relationship with his mother (Scarlett Johansen), his discovery that she’s been hiding a Jewish girl, Elsa ( Thomasin McKenzie) in the attic of their house, and his dawning realisation that Nazi Germany may not be quite as glorious as he's been led to believe. The best sequences are both chilling and funny, as Jojo (beautifully played by Roman Griffin Davies) bumbles his way through a Hitler Youth training weekend. The tone in these early scenes works well; there’s a slightly hysterical note to it all, sunlight on the surface and darkness lurking just beneath. The relationship between mother and son is well done too, and there’s a nice recurring theme about imaginary friends - Jojo’s mum role-plays as his absent father, Jojo pretends to write letters to Elsa from her absent fiance, and Elsa herself is hidden away and can venture out only when no one is around, so imaginary Hitler is in good company.

Now and then there’s a throwaway gag that seems to come from a different movie, like when Jojo, arriving to volunteer at Hitler Youth HQ, is briefly offered the job of ‘walking the clones’ - we see a group of identical blond boys waiting in a corner like jackbooted Midwich Cuckoos, and suddenly, just when the movie has convinced us of the world it’s built, we’re struggling to suspend disbelief again (and all for the sake of a pretty weak one-liner). Not that the wartime Germany on screen is trying too hard to resemble the real one - the fairly irreverent approach to history is signaled from the start, when a German version of the Beatles’ I Wanna Hold Your Hand plays over the credits, and the dialogue makes no attempt to sound as if comes from the 1940s. Jojo’s mother and her house both look surprisingly immaculate after five years of total war - but I guess it’s a child’s eye view, so perhaps the chic clothes and lovely Jugendstil wallpaper are bathed in the same fuzzy glow with which Jojo views the Wehrmacht’s prospects on the Eastern Front.

The presence of Elsa in the attic, and Jojo’s gradual realisation that she isn’t a monster, is the emotional core of the story, and it’s an affecting one, although it’s interesting that the type of anti-Semitism Jojo seems to have been indoctrinated with is of a very superstitious, mediaeval variety - he, and the other Nazis in the movie, harbour lurid, half-formed ideas that Jews drink human blood, have horns and bat wings, read each others’ minds, etc. No doubt real German kids at that time did believe such things, those ancient folk hatreds forming part of the rich soil in which Nazi anti-semitism sunk its roots. The film gets some easy laughs out of them - oh, those stupid Nazis! But there are more modern forms of anti-semitism which were probably much more important in the Nazis’ rise to power - sour conspiracy theories about Jews hoarding wealth, controlling governments and the media, and having more loyalty to each other than to the nation they live in, which Jojo Rabbit never really mentions.

That’s a shame, because those notions still persist today, and not just among neo-Nazis. One of the most shocking things about UK politics in the past few years has been the way these noxious ideas have flowed from the crank left to infect the mainstream, to the point where people I once respected are happy to share weird memes about the Rothschilds and the ‘Hand of Israel’. A film about Nazi Germany that wanted to be relevant (and many of those same people think Jojo Rabbit is ever so relevant) ought to be slightly uncomfortable viewing for them, but no, they can happily chuckle along with its depiction of anti-semitism as a kind of neo-mediaeval phobia which affects only the uneducated and the wicked.

As the film goes on, the tone wobbles seriously. Something happens to Jojo’s mother - the revelation is cleverly done and very shocking -  but it leaves a lot of unanswered questions - would the authorities really have arrested her and not picked up her family as well? Would Jojo be left fending for himself? In the final days of a collapsing regime, perhaps they wouldn’t, and perhaps he would, but it seemed to need a little bit more explanation than the script provides.

Later, when Jojo’s town is invaded by the allies, the film can’t really cope at all. The fall of the Third Reich is already a kind of dreadful comedy, with generals in bunkers issuing grandiose battle plans to vanished panzer divisions while old men and children were sent out to fire one-shot rocket launchers at advancing tanks. Downfall captured some of that dark absurdity, but Downfall was a deeply serious film, and Jojo Rabbit can’t go there. It shows civilians being herded to defend the flimsy barricades, but there’s no weight to the images; sunny and sometimes funny, they still seemed touched with Jojo's boyish fantasies, but surely he's moved beyond those by this stage? There’s no sense that he is ever in real danger of being shot, or that Elsa might emerge from years in hiding only to be raped by the Red Army. We know things like that did happen in real life, but we know they can’t happen in Jojo Rabbit, because Jojo Rabbit is a feelgood film. It’s well-intentioned, well-acted, well-directed, and has a bunch of good jokes, but in the end its comedy just isn’t black enough to match its subject matter.

If it was, of course, nobody would want to watch it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thunder City

This September Scholastic will be publishing my new novel set in the world of Mortal Engines . Here’s the cover, created (like all the others in the series) by Ian McQue . The rule I set for myself when I was writing this one was that it shouldn’t feature any of the people or places from previous Mortal Engines books. So  Thunder Cit y takes place just over a century before the original book, when the town-eat-town world of Traction Cities is slightly less ruthless than it will become later, and none of the characters from the original quartet has even been born yet. (I suppose Mr Shrike must be bimbling about somewhere, but he’s still just yer basic implacable killing machine at this point so there’s not much point in paying him a visit). So hopefully this new take will be accessible to people who’ve never read Mortal Engines , and hopefully people who have read it will enjoy an adventure set in the same world. My pen and ink drawing of the Traction City of Thorbury,  after...

Lord of the Rings 7: Minas Tirith

'This is not a work which many adults will read through more than once,' claimed the historical novelist Alfred Duggan, reviewing The Lord of the Rings when it was published. But I've read it through LOADS of times and now I'm blogging my latest re-read, so what did he know? And so we come to Minas Tirith, Tower of Guard, citadel of Gondor, seven tiers of fancy white fortifications built against a buttress of Mount Mindolluin, with the Tower of Ecthelion rising a thousand feet above the plain. It seems to me the template on which a whole genre of knock-off fantasy cities has been based - I guess Robert E Howard and people wrote about such places before Tolkien, and perhaps there were cities of equal grandeur on Barsoom, but when concept art threads on Instagram throw up unlikely gold and marble castles built on mountaintops and over waterfalls they always look distinctly Minas Tirithy to me. I'm wondering now if London in Mortal Engines was subconsciously echoin...

Merlin (1998)

I remember Merlin being shown on TV as a two-part mini-series over a bank holiday weekend. The version I found on YouTube is a single three hour movie, but I think it might work better in two chunks, as originally broadcast. It still works pretty well, though. Director Steve Barron is completely infatuated with video editing tricks and slightly primitive CGI effects that I’m sure were state-of-the-art when it was made, but he uses them quite inventively, and there are some very enjoyable performances. Since First Knight was such a washout, I guess this is the definitive ‘90s Arthurian film. Like Excalibur , the definitive ‘80s Arthurian film, it tries to tell the entirety of the Arthur story, but since it’s main focus is Merlin it covers a lot more too, and Arthur himself ends up being a bit of a side-character, with the rise and fall of Camelot packed into the second half. At first glance, Merlin seems to be aligning itself with what I’m coming to think of as the Low Arthurian tradi...