Skip to main content

Mars and Beyond!

This old Disney TV show was drawn to my attention a few months ago by animator Hannah Moss - @BrochJam on Twitter. She said it was quite likely that Disney would take it down from YouTube soon, but at time of writing this it’s still up - if all the links in this post stop working. you’ll know it’s gone. If they don’t, you can find the whole thing here, and if you have 52 minutes to spare, it's well worth watching.

Made in 1957, the programme looks at the history of human thinking about Mars, what scientists in 1957 think it’s really like, and how they think we might one day get there. It’s fascinating on several different levels. First, and most obvious, the wonderful animation. Look at how beautifully the characters in the opening sequence are drawn!

And the wonderful invention on display in these aliens in their winter and summer plumage…

While this plucky space heroine definitely deserves her own franchise…
The sequence about the birth of the solar system is a sort of 2D forerunner of Douglas Trumbull’s massive effects sequence in The Tree of Life, which I mentioned in my last blog.
It’s an interesting glimpse of what Disney’s TV documentaries used to be like, with a long and rather fast-forwardable introduction from Uncle Walt himself and the stately narration. It's also a fascinating snapshot of the most up-to-date 1950s ideas about Mars. The Mars which Ray Bradbury was writing of around the same time, with its ethereal ruined cities and dreaming canals, was more fantasy than science fiction, but it wasn’t yet completely implausible. The idea that the Red Planet might harbour multicellular and perhaps even intelligent life wouldn’t be comprehensively scuppered for another few decades.

It's a little awkward that one of the scientists shown working on a manned mission to Mars is that old villain Wernher von Braun, whose hasty extraction from Nazi Germany and reinvention as an all-American hero left such a nasty stain on the US space programme. Fortunately, that gives me an excuse to link to Tom Lehrer’s excellent song about him - "'If the rockets go up, who cares where they come down? That’s not my department,' says Wernher von Braun’.

(Of course, the problem with von Braun’s V2 rockets wasn’t just all the people they killed when they came down, but all the people they killed before they went up. For every victim who perished when a V2 landed on London or Antwerp, at least five slave labourers died in the underground factory at Nordhausen where the things were assembled.)

So you might feel inclined to fast-forward through Wernher too, and reach the spectacular final animated sequence. Far less whimsical than the earlier ones, it demonstrates how square-jawed astronauts of the not-to-distant future might travel from Earth to Mars. Their umbrella-shaped atomic-electric spaceships may look quaint to us, but this is clearly a painstaking attempt to put a believable future on the screen.
 It reminds me a little of the Blue Danube sequences in 2001 - A Space Odyssey, and to modern eyes it has the same slightly wistful, might-have-been quality. It seemed so nearly in reach, this future. I can remember the promise it still seemed to hold out even in the early ‘70s when I was growing up. But the moonbases and domed cities on Mars turned out to be a fantasy. Instead, we got the internet. But that allows us to watch lost treasures from the Space Age like this one, so it’s not all bad.

Comments

Bonny Blue said…
This video is wonderful, especially when the imagination and animation really take-off on speculating what life on Mars could be like!

Popular posts from this blog

Merlin (1998)

I remember Merlin being shown on TV as a two-part mini-series over a bank holiday weekend. The version I found on YouTube is a single three hour movie, but I think it might work better in two chunks, as originally broadcast. It still works pretty well, though. Director Steve Barron is completely infatuated with video editing tricks and slightly primitive CGI effects that I’m sure were state-of-the-art when it was made, but he uses them quite inventively, and there are some very enjoyable performances. Since First Knight was such a washout, I guess this is the definitive ‘90s Arthurian film. Like Excalibur , the definitive ‘80s Arthurian film, it tries to tell the entirety of the Arthur story, but since it’s main focus is Merlin it covers a lot more too, and Arthur himself ends up being a bit of a side-character, with the rise and fall of Camelot packed into the second half. At first glance, Merlin seems to be aligning itself with what I’m coming to think of as the Low Arthurian tradi...

Lord of the Rings 7: Minas Tirith

'This is not a work which many adults will read through more than once,' claimed the historical novelist Alfred Duggan, reviewing The Lord of the Rings when it was published. But I've read it through LOADS of times and now I'm blogging my latest re-read, so what did he know? And so we come to Minas Tirith, Tower of Guard, citadel of Gondor, seven tiers of fancy white fortifications built against a buttress of Mount Mindolluin, with the Tower of Ecthelion rising a thousand feet above the plain. It seems to me the template on which a whole genre of knock-off fantasy cities has been based - I guess Robert E Howard and people wrote about such places before Tolkien, and perhaps there were cities of equal grandeur on Barsoom, but when concept art threads on Instagram throw up unlikely gold and marble castles built on mountaintops and over waterfalls they always look distinctly Minas Tirithy to me. I'm wondering now if London in Mortal Engines was subconsciously echoin...

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword

One of the reasons the Arthurian Legends appeal so much to writers and film makers is that there is no single original version. If there ever was, it was a tale told by some Romano-British storyteller, sitting by a fire in a damp hall, perhaps expounding on the great deeds of a local ruler or late Roman general, and spicing up the action with some motifs borrowed from old Celtic myths. In the centuries that followed, the story grew, and changed. Lots of legends about other heroes got tacked on to it. French and German poets got hold of it and added Camelot, the Grail, and Courtly Love: Malory borrowed from them all in his Morte D’Arthur . Later, everyone from Tennyson to TH White to Rick Wakeman to little me retold the stories, altering them to fit our own vision and reflect our own times. So you can do whatever you like with King Arthur: everyone else has. At least, that’s the theory. Now here's Guy Ritchie’s 2017 box office catastrophe King Arthur, Legend of the Sword to destru...